RERC logo
   Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center
   on Hearing Enhancement

divider between banner and body
spacer for menu buttons spacer for menu buttons spacer for menu buttons
spacer for menu buttons design for top of left side menu
spacer for menu buttons spacer for menu buttons
spacer for menu buttons Home
spacer for menu buttons About the RERC
spacer for menu buttons Projects
spacer for menu buttons Publications
spacer for menu buttons Dr. Ross Says...
spacer for menu buttons Recruitment
spacer for menu buttons Downloads
spacer for menu buttons Links
spacer for menu buttons The RERC Staff
spacer for menu buttons Contact Us
spacer for menu buttons spacer for menu buttons
spacer for menu buttons design for bottom of left side menu
spacer for menu buttons spacer for menu buttons
spacer for menu buttons

            Gallaudet University Logo

spacer for menu buttons

spacer for menu buttons spacer for menu buttons

Dr. Ross on Hearing Loss

Microphone Technique

by Mark Ross, Ph.D.


Recent developments in hearing aid technology confront hearing aid consumers and audiologists with an increasing and bewildering variety of choices. Hearing aids can be programmed to offer a large number of different user controlled operating characteristics, and can be reprogrammed to offer still other possibilities if and when necessary. With the advent of digital hearing aids, the number of possible electroacoustic variations that can be made are simply mind-boggling.

Some modern hearing aids are able to change their characteristics in "real-time", that is the amount and shape of amplification will vary depending upon the level and nature of the input sounds. Multiple memories give users access to, in a sense, a different "hearing aid" each time they toggle a switch or press a remote control. With directional microphones on the hearing aids, the sounds coming from the front are given priority compared to sounds arriving from other directions.

While these are all impressive and encouraging technical developments, the greatest increase in speech comprehension in the presence of noise can probably still be achieved in the same simple way it was possible to do it prior to these developments, and that is by reducing the distance between the speaker and a microphone. Essentially, this is what is meant by the title of this paper--microphone technique.

One does not have to go very far to see good examples of microphone technique. Every television newsperson knows that it is necessary to place the microphone close to a speaker if speech is to be easily understood. The mechanism for this advantage is easy to explain: by placing the microphone close to a talker's mouth, the speech signal is louder at the microphone than are the background noises. This relationship--between the loudness of the desired speech signals and the undesired noise background--is called the speech to noise ratio (S/N), and it is probably the single most important factor determining speech comprehension for everybody, whether one is hearing-impaired or not. If the speech signal is too soft or is masked by noise, it can hardly be understood very well. Given this fact, it is distressing to note how often the speech to noise concept is ignored or minimized by professionals and the public alike. Good microphone technique will increase both the speech loudness and the speech to noise ratio. In this paper, I'll give some examples of common problems with microphone technique and suggest how they can be minimized or overcome.

The Public Lecture

This section applies in any listening situation in which the speaker is using a microphone. The amplification device can be a traditional public address (PA) system, an infra-red (IR) device, or an FM radio unit specifically designed for hearing-impaired people. The first step for people to benefit from any these auditory assistive devices is to ensure that the speech level reaching the microphone is appropriately loud. If it is weak, the amplified signal reaching the hearing-impaired person will also be weak. If the listener attempts to compensate by turning the IR or FM receiver volume up, the level of the background noise will also increase and mask the desired speech signals. Over and over again, one can observe speakers moving away from the microphone during a lecture or sermon. I've seen speakers actually move the microphone away from them on the podium, evidently viewing it as an obstacle between them and their attempts to "connect" with the audience. That they're also losing an audience that can't hear them doesn't seem to register.

It doesn't take much distance from the microphone to significantly drop the loudness level of the speech received by a listener. Many microphones are designed to operate most efficiently when the mouth is less than six to eight inches away. At any distance greater than this, and the microphone may hardly register the speech signals. Some microphones are so insensitive that when a speaker is about two or more feet away, hardly any speech signal at all is converted to an electrical current (the basis operation of all microphones).

Other more sensitive microphones will respond to distant speech sounds, but they also pick up background noises as well, and thus decrease the speech to noise ratio. Particularly disturbing is the speaker who alternately moves all around the microphone, sometimes coming so close that one can hear and be disturbed by the bursts of the plosive consonants (such as /p/ and /t/), and sometimes so far that hardly any sound at all can be heard. One can but assume that such speakers get so involved in delivering their message that they ignore the other half of a communication situation--the recipients. Sometimes the speaker will hold the microphone in his/her hand and instead of talking into it, use it as a baton or pointer in during the talk. When faced with poor microphone technique, hearing-impaired people have a number of options that can improve their speech comprehension.

  1. In a recurring condition (such as a continuing lecture series, or a sermon in a church or synagogue), the hearing-impaired person can approach the speaker before the lecture and remind him or her of the necessity to stay consistently within a reasonable distance from the microphone. This is an anticipatory coping strategy; it is an attempt to solve the problem before it occurs. I've never had a speaker resent my reminding him or her to stay close to the microphone (although I can't say that my gentle "reminder" was always successful).
  2. Another strategy is to supply the speaker with a lapel microphone (rather than one fixed to the podium). This will not only ensure a constant distance from the speaker's mouth, but will enable him or her to move freely around the podium (limited by the length of the microphone cord).
  3. In some lecture situations, it is not unreasonable for the hearing-impaired consumer to publicly (and loudly) remind the speaker to "get closer to the microphone please." Unfortunately, it is not considered socially appropriate to make this request more than once or twice within a single lecture period.
  4. The best solution is an FM wireless microphone which ensures both a close distance and mobility. This permits the speaker to assume a normal speaking voice and comfortable speaking positions.
  5. Hearing-impaired people have a great deal of difficulty in lecture formats in which the audience is encouraged to ask questions. While the loudness of the lecturer's voice may be adequate, the questions may be inaudible to the hearing-impaired person. There are several options in this type of situation:
    1. In an anticipatory strategy, the lecturer can be asked (or reminded) to please repeat the question before answering it. A reasonable "assertive" strategy is for the hearing-impaired listener to publically request that a question be repeated before it is answered by the speaker. Unfortunately, some audience "questions" are really comments and it is not realistic to expect the lecturer to summarize such comments before responding.
    2. The best situations would be to make available one or more audience microphones (such as is done on many audience participation TV shows). I've attended a number of conferences that provided audience microphones; invariably, a number of other people in the audience commented on how helpful the arrangment was for them too. Not only did it impose some discipline on the audience participation, but it ensured that all people in the audience hear the questions.

The Committee Meeting

The factors that must be considered here are the number of people at the meeting, the shape of the table, and the background sounds. In all of them, perhaps the most difficult, and the most necessary, condition to arrange is speaker discipline; if more than one person speaks at a time, the effectiveness of all the alternatives listed below will be reduced.

  1. If there are only a few people around a small table, it may be sufficient for the hearing- impaired person (wearing a hearing-aid) to ensure that the face of each speaker is clearly visible, and to ask the group to talk a little louder when requested. Noise sources should be identified, and eliminated or reduced when possible.
  2. In larger meetings, an conference microphone is an extremely useful assistive device. An FM or Infra-Red (IR) conference microphone can be placed in the middle of a round table. In this way, no person around the table is more than two or three feet away from the sensitive microphone (not, perhaps, the most ideal distance, but better than four to eight feet away). The use of either of these microphones requires that the hearing-impaired person wear either an FM or IR receiver, which then delivers the amplified signal to a user's ears, either directly or coupled to personal hearing aids. When privacy is an issue, an IR system should be employed; when privacy is not an issue, either an FM or IR system can be used.
  3. If the meeting is being held around a rectangular table, then a two (or more) microphone array can be employed. Several of them can be placed at two to four locations on the table, all of which are connected to either an FM or IR transmitter. Basically, for any shape table, the hearing-impaired person's ability to hear speech depends on how far a microphone is from a speaker. The closer the better.
  4. It is possible to use a single microphone in a meeting, but this requires that it be passed to each prospective talker. An advantage of this approach is that it does make for a more disciplined, if somewhat more stilted, meeting. What needs to be communicated to the group is the fact that the microphone really represents the "ear" of the hearing-impaired person, and that the best reception can be obtained with a close and consistent distance from a mouth to the "ear." In addition, the microphone should be handled gently; banging the microphone on the table, or shuffling paper next to it (taking lunch out of a brown paper bag is the worst offender), should be discouraged. All of these events create unacceptible and unpleasant sounds in the ear of the hearing-impaired listener.
  5. In some high-level political or diplomatic meetings, one can observe a microphone at each speaker's location, with a light control that signals whether the microphone is "live" or "off". This is ideal, of course, as long as either one person talks at a time. In some situations, a sound engineer controls the activation of the microphones, but this is not exactly a realistic possibility for most of us in most group situations.

The Social Gathering

The optimal listening condition for a hearing-impaired person is a one-on-one conversation in a small quiet room. The most difficult listening condition is probably trying to follow a group conversation in a large noisy room. Examples of this latter situation are wedding receptions while the band is playing, an office cocktail party, a large dinner party in a restaurant, or a multi-generational family reunion. The best hearing aid in the world, with the most advanced digitital circuitry on the market, will only going to be marginally useful in these kinds of situations. (Still, I hasten to add, for most hearing-impaired people, it is usually easier to communicate with a hearing aid than without it in any kind of situation).

The best solution in these types of situations is for the hearing-impaired person to personally control an external microphone connected to his or her hearing device. The microphone, which can be of the wireless FM variety transmitting to personal FM systems (or BTE FMHA units), hard-wired into the hearing aid via a direct audio input (DAI), or incorporated in a personal listening device such as a body hearing aid, must be held by the listener and placed close to the mouth of the talker. As the conversational partner shifts, then so must the position of the microphone From an acoustic point of view, there is no doubt that this will enhance the ability to understand speech. Audiologists have available an array of microphone possibilities which can be employed in this fashion.

For many hearing-impaired people, however, this is not an acceptable solution. Some will object to any visible indication that they have a hearing loss and that they require additional auditory assistance; others find it difficult to change the habits of a lifetime and publicly assert their rights in a communicative exchange. This is an issue which extends beyond microphone technique; if a hearing-impaired person is unable or unwilling, for whatever reason, to acknowledge the reality of a hearing problem, then the effectiveness of any subsequent remediation procedure is going to be limited. For hearing-impaired people, self-acceptance is the key that can unlock a fuller participation in the wider society in many situations. Given self-acceptance, one can comfortably acknowledge the presence of a hearing loss if that is what it takes to improve speech comprehension. At the present state of the art, there simply is no better way of understanding speech in noisy places than locating an external microphone close to the lips of the person talking.

The Classroom

Classroom teachers in special schools have been using microphones or auditory training systems for decades and, with the assistance of an on-site audiologist, are generally skilled in their use. New and special teachers (shop or art, for example), and classroom aides, on the other hand, do need instructions in the effective use of a microphone (and even skilled teachers, occasionally still need some reminding). Some of the common problems in classroom use of an FM microphone (the most common type) will be discussed in this section.

The most important principle in using an FM microphone in a classroom is for the user to ensure that it is switched on when the recipient is supposed to hear the utterance and tumed off when the message is not intended for the FM user (either individually or as a member of the class). Keeping the FM microphone turned on while the teacher circulates in a classroom exposes the hearing-impaired person to irrelevant and disturbing speech inputs. No matter how visibly distant the teacher is from the student, the sounds in the student's ears do not diminish in loudness (as would normally be true for distant speech sounds in a classroom). With an understanding of this principle and some conscientious practice, teachers soon automatically switch the FM microphone on and off appropriately. Optimally, the students themselves should be self-confident to be able to remind a teacher when he or she is using the microphone inappropriately.

The FM microphone must be worn to be effective. Some teachers may lay it on the desk while sitting there, thinking that the sound detection qualities will remain unimpaired. This is not so. The FM microphones are most effective when situated close to a talker's lips. Placing an FM microphone over a heavy necklace or chain is not a good idea. The slight collisions which occur at the microphone sound like thunderous explosions in the hearing-impaired person's ear. The antenna of the FM microphone (a wire extending below a lavellier FM microphone/transmitter, or the cord connecting a lapel microphone with the transmitter) is not for nervous hands to twiddle; these motions create noises in the ears of the listener. It is also not a good idea to place the microphone next to a motor driven movie projector or tape recorder. The sounds of the motor will obliterate the speech sounds; there are auxiliary inputs on FM microphones that may be used in this type of situation. When viewing a video program in school, however, it is not only acceptable but recommended that the microphone be placed close to the TV loudspeaker.

More and more we are seeing FM systems being utilized in regular post-secondary educational programs. College-age hearing-impaired students are learning the advantages of using a personal FM system in large college classrooms. For the most part, these young men and women have to take personal responsibility for convincing the college instructor to wear the FM system, and ensure that it is working appropriately. Some college instructors may at first be reluctant to wear the device, but this can usually be resolved in a personal meeting. Even if there is a P.A. system in the classroom or lecture hall, it is still advisable to use the FM microphone (perhaps placed next to the podium microphone). While the speaker may use a podium microphone appropriately in a P.A. system, if the loudspeakers are some distance from the listener, speech reception will still be negatively affected. An FM system will ensure that the signal the person receives is essentially no further than the distance between the speaker and the microphone.

At Home

There is an increasing recognition that good microphone technique is especially critical for young hearing-impaired children. Most of these children have potentially usable residual hearing. Because loud ambient noises are such a common occurrence in our society, it is difficult to provide these children with a high-quality amplified speech signals. If the children cannot clearly distinguish the desired speech sounds from the unwanted background noises (a foreground-background distinction), then their auditory development of speech and language will be affected. This problem can be reduced or circumvented by parental use of an FM auditory training system.

As noted above, when used appropriately, these systems help ensure a consistently high speech to noise ratio. Parents do have to learn how to use them correctly, in much the same manner that teachers do. The same general principles apply, both in the classroom and at home:

  1. The child should not be exposed to irrelevant inputs (though it is impossible to eliminate them all!).
  2. The microphone should not be the focus of manipulations by nervous hands.
  3. Necklaces or other jewelry should not be placed where they frequently collide with the microphone suspended around the neck.
  4. Good microphone technique at home does not mean that all speech inputs must be through the FM microphone. It should be noted that when using an FM microphone, the distance from the talker to the receiver has a negligible effect upon the loudness of the speech received by a child (within the range of the FM transmitter). It may help a child to eventually become more flexible in speech processing if the built-in microphones on the FM receiver (or BTE FM/HA system) are alternatively used when talking to a child. This will help the child learn to process the normal spectral variations that occur in speech signals as distances are changed.

In summary, good microphone technique cannot be taken for granted. When a microphone is used appropriately, it helps ensure that hearing-impaired people can more effectively use their residual hearing regardless of the kind and type of amplification system that is being employed.


This paper was supported, in part, by Grant #RH133E30015 from the U.S. Department of Education, NIDRR, to the Lexington Center.

divider between body and bottom of page
RERC brand logo

Copyright 2011 by the RERC on Hearing Enhancement -- All Rights Reserved
Last modified: 07/01/2013

For more information, email
For technical support with this website, email

Valid HTML 4.01 TransitionalThis site is W3C HTML 4.01 Transitional Compliant.